Remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
New Members
Isaac97 2012/9/4
KOPIKAU 2012/9/3
tansl 2012/6/27
tjee0512 2012/3/29
teresaong 2012/3/24
Sponsored 2

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

Bakun Dam
Just can't stay away
2008/1/18 2:36
From Kuching
Posts: 2294
Saw this on facebook:


Bakun Dam ‘is an economic rip-off’

By Joseph Tawie

The construction of the Bakun and seven other dams plus the coal-fired power plants are economic rip-offs – they are Sarawak’s own get-rich-quick schemes.

“The massive sums involved in building these large dams would certainly guarantee handsome profits for the privileged project proponents,” said See Chee How, Sarawak PKR information chief.

“This is not development for Sarawak, but an economic rip-off. Sarawak-owned get-rich-quick schemes have exhausted our timber resources.

“Almost all our agricultural land have been leased out,” he said when commenting on the astronomical costs of constructing the Bakun Dam.

PKR, he said, wants the government to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry or a Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry to find out the final costs of the Bakun hydro-electric project and where the money has gone to.

“The commission should also re-examine the cost-benefit analysis and the economic viability of the Bakun project,” said See.

See added that the original cost was estimated at RM3.95 billion in 1983 and RM4.09 billion in 1985. With cost overruns and compensation for delays and interests, the final tag is believed to have escalated to RM15 billion today.

“But Malaysians have been kept in the dark as to the final costs and where the substantial additional sums have gone to,” he said.

India’s experience

“Even with the cost now estimated by the federal government at RM7.3 billion, double the original estimate, there is a need to re-examine the cost benefit analysis and the economic viability of the Bakun project” said See.

“It must be borne in mind that only one out of the originally planned eight hydro turbines will be commissioned next year, reducing its power generating capacity from 2,400MW to 300MW.

“Take India’s experience: it has more than 3,000 dams but 60% of them are economically non-viable financial disasters because they are not able to recoup their investments.”

“The Sarawak BN government owes all Sarawakians an explanation. We want Second Planning and Resource Management Minister Awang Tengah Ali Hassan to give us his reason for saying that the Bakun Dam is not a white elephant.

“Sarawakians have paid their share of the cost of the RM15-billion project and we now have to fork out another RM7 billion to buy the federal project,” he said.

“What is the actual cost to all Sarawakians? We have not included the socio-economic and environmental costs which all Sarawakians have to bear.

“Bakun was originally projected to generate 2,400MW power. If the state government is convinced that Bakun is economically viable, Sarawakians should be convinced that it can generate the 2,400MW power.

“Otherwise, what is the justification for the seven new dams and more coal-fired power plants?” he asked.

Posted on: 2010/10/12 8:57
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Re: Bakun Dam
Home away from home
2006/8/10 22:42
From kuciang
Posts: 1717
younno,many years back i was really vely "proud" when i learnt that my country is going to have a hydro dam, ...waa a hydro dam man( big deal yeah ?) now and today,i pissed off with this dam thingy - manyak tipu ,sekijap ini macam sekijap itu macam . too late oledi lah ,so much of our country resources and earnings goes to the drains and to those "pockets"

Posted on: 2010/10/12 9:05
And when things get difficult , Draco's star shown more brightly for all of us who knew where to look.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Re: Bakun Dam
Home away from home
2008/7/9 1:57
Posts: 264
Sarawakians ought to be proud of their CM's unrelenting effort in completing this mega- dam, and others to come. You are indeed the envy of many industrialised countries that are not as fortunate.

Will it henceforth cost you less to consume electricity? Maybe more, as the construction outlay needs to be recouped. Who from but the consumers and taxpayers.

Don't you suspect that TM is seriously contemplating his family owning majority shares when Sarawak buys the dam? The insidious pattern will continue!

Posted on: 2010/10/12 9:57
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Re: Bakun Dam
Home away from home
2009/3/19 23:17
Posts: 164
in overseas, whenever they touch on hydrodam, they frown upon the idea.

wind, solar receive good reception, instead. nuclear and coal, instead, have the potential to generate the required electricity. one nuke can produce 4GW. Bakun? 2GW?

Posted on: 2010/10/12 15:36
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Re: Bakun Dam
Home away from home
2008/10/8 22:06
Posts: 161
This is just me speculating lar...you know..kopitiam talk? You know why the Government don't seemed to be in a hurry about selling or buying the dam for that matter?

Let's do a simple math, an area of the size of Singapore, if filled with timber...how much you think it's worth?

I'm sure, there is not such hurry because in a way the timber sold from the building the dam is justified...

Just my 2 cent, don't shoot me...hahaha...

Posted on: 2010/10/13 19:24
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You can vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

[code][/code] test